I agree with JL Collins that a house/flat is a terrible "investment". At best a primary residential property is usually an expensive indulgence.
There are various methods for calculating renting versus buying. FIRECracker and her husband retired early in part by not buying overpriced real estate in their native Canada. Her formulas involve comparing equity trapped in a home compared to what it could earn invested in her stock portfolio.
JL Collins offers as usual a simpler approach that is easy to calculate. (See the "Post Script" section of his article to review the formulas.):
I like numbers of a lot so here a few examples of calculations using real-world examples. These examples use JL Collins' formula as described above.
Zürich Area 3.5 Room Apartment
Purchase price: 885,000 CHF
Annual rent: 27,540 CHF (2,295 CHF per month)
Purchase price / annual rent: 31.1
In other words one would have to rent this apartment for 31 years to equal the value of the property.
Buffalo, New York, United States Single Family Home
Purchase price: $300,000
Annual rent: $24,000 ($2,000 per month)
Purchase price / annual rent: 12.5
One would have to rent the house for only 12.5 years to equal the value of the property.
I am curious if there is a home anywhere in Switzerland that has a price/rent quotient under 16. There are a few cheap houses in remote mountain towns but they are priced low due to their dilapidated condition.
My question to the Swiss FI community:
Is there a region or municipality anywhere in Switzerland where the property price / annual rent quotient is under 16?
Please let me know because maybe then I will feel comfortable buying a residential property in that region if it is a rational decision. I consider buying a home in my current municipality (near Zürich) to be unwise financially.
There are various methods for calculating renting versus buying. FIRECracker and her husband retired early in part by not buying overpriced real estate in their native Canada. Her formulas involve comparing equity trapped in a home compared to what it could earn invested in her stock portfolio.
JL Collins offers as usual a simpler approach that is easy to calculate. (See the "Post Script" section of his article to review the formulas.):
House price/Annual rent.
If the result is 21+ renting is better
Between 16-20 it’s a toss-up
less than 16 is a vote to buy
Using our number: $330,000/$24,000 = 13.75 This says we should buy, or in our case stay put.
I like numbers of a lot so here a few examples of calculations using real-world examples. These examples use JL Collins' formula as described above.
Zürich Area 3.5 Room Apartment
Purchase price: 885,000 CHF
Annual rent: 27,540 CHF (2,295 CHF per month)
Purchase price / annual rent: 31.1
In other words one would have to rent this apartment for 31 years to equal the value of the property.
Buffalo, New York, United States Single Family Home
Purchase price: $300,000
Annual rent: $24,000 ($2,000 per month)
Purchase price / annual rent: 12.5
One would have to rent the house for only 12.5 years to equal the value of the property.
I am curious if there is a home anywhere in Switzerland that has a price/rent quotient under 16. There are a few cheap houses in remote mountain towns but they are priced low due to their dilapidated condition.
My question to the Swiss FI community:
Is there a region or municipality anywhere in Switzerland where the property price / annual rent quotient is under 16?
Please let me know because maybe then I will feel comfortable buying a residential property in that region if it is a rational decision. I consider buying a home in my current municipality (near Zürich) to be unwise financially.